more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 8452

[filed under theme 5. Theory of Logic / G. Quantification / 1. Quantification ]

Full Idea

In traditional logic from Aristotle to Kant, universal sentences have existential import, but Brentano and Boole construed them as universal conditionals (such as 'for anything, if it is a man, then it is mortal').

Gist of Idea

Traditionally, universal sentences had existential import, but were later treated as conditional claims

Source

Alex Orenstein (W.V. Quine [2002], Ch.2)

Book Ref

Orenstein,Alex: 'W.V. Quine' [Princeton 2002], p.15


A Reaction

I am sympathetic to the idea that even the 'existential' quantifier should be treated as conditional, or fictional. Modern Christians may well routinely quantify over angels, without actually being committed to them.


The 14 ideas from 'W.V. Quine'

Traditionally, universal sentences had existential import, but were later treated as conditional claims [Orenstein]
The whole numbers are 'natural'; 'rational' numbers include fractions; the 'reals' include root-2 etc. [Orenstein]
The Principle of Conservatism says we should violate the minimum number of background beliefs [Orenstein]
Just individuals in Nominalism; add sets for Extensionalism; add properties, concepts etc for Intensionalism [Orenstein]
Three ways for 'Socrates is human' to be true are nominalist, platonist, or Montague's way [Orenstein]
Mereology has been exploited by some nominalists to achieve the effects of set theory [Orenstein]
Unlike elementary logic, set theory is not complete [Orenstein]
Sentential logic is consistent (no contradictions) and complete (entirely provable) [Orenstein]
Axiomatization simply picks from among the true sentences a few to play a special role [Orenstein]
The logicists held that is-a-member-of is a logical constant, making set theory part of logic [Orenstein]
The substitution view of quantification says a sentence is true when there is a substitution instance [Orenstein]
People presume meanings exist because they confuse meaning and reference [Orenstein]
If two people believe the same proposition, this implies the existence of propositions [Orenstein]
S4: 'poss that poss that p' implies 'poss that p'; S5: 'poss that nec that p' implies 'nec that p' [Orenstein]