more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 8457

[filed under theme 14. Science / B. Scientific Theories / 1. Scientific Theory ]

Full Idea

The principle of conservatism in choosing between theories is a maxim of minimal mutilation, stating that of competing theories, all other things being equal, choose the one that violates the fewest background beliefs held.

Gist of Idea

The Principle of Conservatism says we should violate the minimum number of background beliefs

Source

Alex Orenstein (W.V. Quine [2002], Ch.2)

Book Ref

Orenstein,Alex: 'W.V. Quine' [Princeton 2002], p.36


A Reaction

In this sense, all rational people should be conservatives. The idea is a modern variant of Hume's objection to miracles (Idea 2227). A Kuhnian 'paradigm shift' is the dramatic moment when this principle no longer seems appropriate.

Related Idea

Idea 2227 A miracle violates laws which have been established by continuous unchanging experience, so should be ignored [Hume]


The 14 ideas from Alex Orenstein

Traditionally, universal sentences had existential import, but were later treated as conditional claims [Orenstein]
The whole numbers are 'natural'; 'rational' numbers include fractions; the 'reals' include root-2 etc. [Orenstein]
The Principle of Conservatism says we should violate the minimum number of background beliefs [Orenstein]
Just individuals in Nominalism; add sets for Extensionalism; add properties, concepts etc for Intensionalism [Orenstein]
Three ways for 'Socrates is human' to be true are nominalist, platonist, or Montague's way [Orenstein]
Mereology has been exploited by some nominalists to achieve the effects of set theory [Orenstein]
Unlike elementary logic, set theory is not complete [Orenstein]
Axiomatization simply picks from among the true sentences a few to play a special role [Orenstein]
Sentential logic is consistent (no contradictions) and complete (entirely provable) [Orenstein]
The logicists held that is-a-member-of is a logical constant, making set theory part of logic [Orenstein]
The substitution view of quantification says a sentence is true when there is a substitution instance [Orenstein]
People presume meanings exist because they confuse meaning and reference [Orenstein]
If two people believe the same proposition, this implies the existence of propositions [Orenstein]
S4: 'poss that poss that p' implies 'poss that p'; S5: 'poss that nec that p' implies 'nec that p' [Orenstein]