more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 8477

[filed under theme 19. Language / A. Nature of Meaning / 10. Denial of Meanings ]

Full Idea

A good part of the confidence people have that there are meanings rests on the confusion of meaning and reference.

Gist of Idea

People presume meanings exist because they confuse meaning and reference

Source

Alex Orenstein (W.V. Quine [2002], Ch.6)

Book Ref

Orenstein,Alex: 'W.V. Quine' [Princeton 2002], p.121


A Reaction

An important point. Everyone assumes that sentences link to the world, but Frege shows that that is not part of meaning. Words like prepositions and conjunctions ('to', 'and') don't have 'a meaning' apart from their function and use.


The 14 ideas from 'W.V. Quine'

Traditionally, universal sentences had existential import, but were later treated as conditional claims [Orenstein]
The whole numbers are 'natural'; 'rational' numbers include fractions; the 'reals' include root-2 etc. [Orenstein]
The Principle of Conservatism says we should violate the minimum number of background beliefs [Orenstein]
Just individuals in Nominalism; add sets for Extensionalism; add properties, concepts etc for Intensionalism [Orenstein]
Three ways for 'Socrates is human' to be true are nominalist, platonist, or Montague's way [Orenstein]
Mereology has been exploited by some nominalists to achieve the effects of set theory [Orenstein]
Unlike elementary logic, set theory is not complete [Orenstein]
Sentential logic is consistent (no contradictions) and complete (entirely provable) [Orenstein]
Axiomatization simply picks from among the true sentences a few to play a special role [Orenstein]
The logicists held that is-a-member-of is a logical constant, making set theory part of logic [Orenstein]
The substitution view of quantification says a sentence is true when there is a substitution instance [Orenstein]
People presume meanings exist because they confuse meaning and reference [Orenstein]
If two people believe the same proposition, this implies the existence of propositions [Orenstein]
S4: 'poss that poss that p' implies 'poss that p'; S5: 'poss that nec that p' implies 'nec that p' [Orenstein]