more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 8535

[filed under theme 8. Modes of Existence / B. Properties / 10. Properties as Predicates ]

Full Idea

Upholders of properties have been inclined to postulate a distinct property corresponding to each distinct predicate. We could start by eliminating all those properties where the predicate fails to apply, is not true, of anything.

Gist of Idea

To the claim that every predicate has a property, start by eliminating failure of application of predicate

Source

David M. Armstrong (Properties [1992], §1)

Book Ref

'Properties', ed/tr. Mellor,D.H. /Oliver,A [OUP 1997], p.165


A Reaction

This would leave billions of conjunctional, disjunctional and gerrymandered properties where the predicate applies very well. We are all 'on the same planet as New York'. Am I allowed to say that I 'wish' that a was F? He aims for 'sparse' properties.


The 17 ideas from 'Properties'

What matters is not how many entities we postulate, but how many kinds of entities [Armstrong, by Mellor/Oliver]
Predicates need ontological correlates to ensure that they apply [Armstrong]
There must be some explanation of why certain predicates are applicable to certain objects [Armstrong]
Whether we apply 'cold' or 'hot' to an object is quite separate from its change of temperature [Armstrong]
To the claim that every predicate has a property, start by eliminating failure of application of predicate [Armstrong]
Deniers of properties and relations rely on either predicates or on classes [Armstrong]
Resemblances must be in certain 'respects', and they seem awfully like properties [Armstrong]
Change of temperature in objects is quite independent of the predicates 'hot' and 'cold' [Armstrong]
We want to know what constituents of objects are grounds for the application of predicates [Armstrong]
In most sets there is no property common to all the members [Armstrong]
Tropes fall into classes, because exact similarity is symmetrical and transitive [Armstrong]
Trope theory needs extra commitments, to symmetry and non-transitivity, unless resemblance is exact [Armstrong]
Universals are required to give a satisfactory account of the laws of nature [Armstrong]
Regularities theories are poor on causal connections, counterfactuals and probability [Armstrong]
The introduction of sparse properties avoids the regularity theory's problem with 'grue' [Armstrong]
Without properties we would be unable to express the laws of nature [Armstrong]
Essences might support Resemblance Nominalism, but they are too coarse and ill-defined [Armstrong]