more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 8555

[filed under theme 9. Objects / D. Essence of Objects / 15. Against Essentialism ]

Full Idea

There is, putting aside historical properties and 'identity properties', no subset of the properties of a thing which constitutes an individual essence, so that having those properties is necessary and sufficient for being that particular thing.

Gist of Idea

There is no subset of properties which guarantee a thing's identity

Source

Sydney Shoemaker (Causality and Properties [1980], §05)

Book Ref

Shoemaker,Sydney: 'Identity, Cause and Mind' [OUP 2003], p.218


A Reaction

He asserts this rather dogmatically. If he says a thing can lose its essence, I agree, but it seems to me that there must be a group of features which will guarantee that (if they are present) it has that identity.


The 33 ideas from 'Causality and Properties'

Universals concern how things are, and how they could be [Shoemaker, by Bird]
Shoemaker says all genuine properties are dispositional [Shoemaker, by Ellis]
If causality is between events, there must be reference to the properties involved [Shoemaker]
Genuine properties are closely related to genuine changes [Shoemaker]
A causal theory of properties focuses on change, not (say) on abstract properties of numbers [Shoemaker]
Some truths are not because of a thing's properties, but because of the properties of related things [Shoemaker]
Things have powers in virtue of (which are entailed by) their properties [Shoemaker]
One power can come from different properties; a thing's powers come from its properties [Shoemaker]
'Square', 'round' and 'made of copper' show that not all properties are dispositional [Shoemaker]
Dispositional predicates ascribe powers, and the rest ascribe properties [Shoemaker]
Triangular and trilateral are coextensive, but different concepts; but powers and properties are the same [Shoemaker]
We should abandon the idea that properties are the meanings of predicate expressions [Shoemaker]
The identity of a property concerns its causal powers [Shoemaker]
Properties are clusters of conditional powers [Shoemaker]
Properties are functions producing powers, and powers are functions producing effects [Shoemaker]
Could properties change without the powers changing, or powers change without the properties changing? [Shoemaker]
If properties are separated from causal powers, this invites total elimination [Shoemaker]
Properties must be essentially causal if we can know and speak about them [Shoemaker]
There is no subset of properties which guarantee a thing's identity [Shoemaker]
Possible difference across worlds depends on difference across time in the actual world [Shoemaker]
It looks as if the immutability of the powers of a property imply essentiality [Shoemaker]
To ascertain genuine properties, examine the object directly [Shoemaker]
Grueness is not, unlike green and blue, associated with causal potential [Shoemaker]
The notions of property and of causal power are parts of a single system of related concepts [Shoemaker]
One system has properties, powers, events, similarity and substance [Shoemaker]
Analysis aims at internal relationships, not reduction [Shoemaker]
If causal laws describe causal potentialities, the same laws govern properties in all possible worlds [Shoemaker]
If properties are causal, then causal necessity is a species of logical necessity [Shoemaker]
If a world has different causal laws, it must have different properties [Shoemaker]
'Conceivable' is either not-provably-false, or compatible with what we know? [Shoemaker]
It is possible to conceive what is not possible [Shoemaker]
Actually, properties are individuated by causes as well as effects [Shoemaker]
Formerly I said properties are individuated by essential causal powers and causing instantiation [Shoemaker, by Shoemaker]