more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 8608

[filed under theme 26. Natural Theory / C. Causation / 9. General Causation / c. Counterfactual causation ]

Full Idea

A counterfactual can be said to 'backtrack' if it can be said that if the present were different a different past would have led up to it (rather than if the present were different, the same past would have had a different outcome).

Gist of Idea

Counterfactuals 'backtrack' if a different present implies a different past

Source

David Lewis (New work for a theory of universals [1983], 'Dup,Sup,Div')

Book Ref

'Properties', ed/tr. Mellor,D.H. /Oliver,A [OUP 1997], p.208


A Reaction

A nice clear definition of a concept which is important in Lewis's analysis of causation. In the current context he is concerned with elucidation of determinism and materialism. I would say (intuitively) that all counterfactuals backtrack.


The 33 ideas from 'New work for a theory of universals'

Natural properties figure in the analysis of similarity in intrinsic respects [Lewis, by Oliver]
Lewisian natural properties fix reference of predicates, through a principle of charity [Lewis, by Hawley]
Lewis says properties are sets of actual and possible objects [Lewis, by Heil]
Physics aims to discover which universals actually exist [Lewis, by Moore,AW]
Properties are classes of possible and actual concrete particulars [Lewis, by Koslicki]
Lewisian properties have powers because of their relationships to other properties [Lewis, by Hawthorne]
The One over Many problem (in predication terms) deserves to be neglected (by ostriches) [Lewis]
In addition to analysis of a concept, one can deny it, or accept it as primitive [Lewis]
Objects are demarcated by density and chemistry, and natural properties belong in what is well demarcated [Lewis]
Reference partly concerns thought and language, partly eligibility of referent by natural properties [Lewis]
Natural properties tend to belong to well-demarcated things, typically loci of causal chains [Lewis]
For us, a property being natural is just an aspect of its featuring in the contents of our attitudes [Lewis]
A sophisticated principle of charity sometimes imputes error as well as truth [Lewis]
We need natural properties in order to motivate the principle of charity [Lewis]
Counterfactuals 'backtrack' if a different present implies a different past [Lewis]
Physics aims for a list of natural properties [Lewis]
Supervenience is reduction without existence denials, ontological priorities, or translatability [Lewis]
A supervenience thesis is a denial of independent variation [Lewis]
I suspend judgements about universals, but their work must be done [Lewis]
A law of nature is any regularity that earns inclusion in the ideal system [Lewis]
Causal counterfactuals must avoid backtracking, to avoid epiphenomena and preemption [Lewis]
Physics discovers laws and causal explanations, and also the natural properties required [Lewis]
Psychophysical identity implies the possibility of idealism or panpsychism [Lewis]
Materialism is (roughly) that two worlds cannot differ without differing physically [Lewis]
All perfectly natural properties are intrinsic [Lewis, by Lewis]
Natural properties fix resemblance and powers, and are picked out by universals [Lewis]
Universals are wholly present in their instances, whereas properties are spread around [Lewis]
Any class of things is a property, no matter how whimsical or irrelevant [Lewis]
There are far more properties than any brain could ever encodify [Lewis]
We need properties as semantic values for linguistic expressions [Lewis]
Most properties are causally irrelevant, and we can't spot the relevant ones. [Lewis]
To have a property is to be a member of a class, usually a class of things [Lewis]
Class Nominalism and Resemblance Nominalism are pretty much the same [Lewis]