more on this theme | more from this thinker | more from this text
Full Idea
What are we supposed to abstract from to get from the moon to the number 1? We do get certain concepts, such as satellite, but 1 is not to be met with. In the case of 0 we have no objects at all. ..The essence of number must work for 0 and 1.
Gist of Idea
You can abstract concepts from the moon, but the number one is not among them
Source
Gottlob Frege (Grundlagen der Arithmetik (Foundations) [1884], §44)
Book Ref
Frege,Gottlob: 'The Foundations of Arithmetic (Austin)', ed/tr. Austin,J.L. [Blackwell 1980], p.57
A Reaction
Note that Frege seems to be conceding psychological abstraction for most other concepts. But why can't you abstract from your abstractions, to reach high-level abstractions? And why should numbers not emerge at those higher levels?