more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 8731

[filed under theme 6. Mathematics / C. Sources of Mathematics / 10. Constructivism / c. Conceptualism ]

Full Idea

I classify conceptualists according to what they say about properties or concepts. If someone classified properties as existing independent of language I would classify her as a realist in ontology of mathematics. Or they may be idealists or nominalists.

Gist of Idea

Conceptualist are just realists or idealist or nominalists, depending on their view of concepts

Source

Stewart Shapiro (Thinking About Mathematics [2000], 2.2.1)

Book Ref

Shapiro,Stewart: 'Thinking About Mathematics' [OUP 2000], p.26


A Reaction

In other words, Shapiro wants to eliminate 'conceptualist' as a useful label in philosophy of mathematics. He's probably right. All thought involves concepts, but that doesn't produce a conceptualist theory of, say, football.


The 15 ideas from 'Thinking About Mathematics'

Rationalism tries to apply mathematical methodology to all of knowledge [Shapiro]
'Impredicative' definitions refer to the thing being described [Shapiro]
Intuitionists deny excluded middle, because it is committed to transcendent truth or objects [Shapiro]
Conceptualist are just realists or idealist or nominalists, depending on their view of concepts [Shapiro]
Logicism seems to be a non-starter if (as is widely held) logic has no ontology of its own [Shapiro]
Term Formalism says mathematics is just about symbols - but real numbers have no names [Shapiro]
Game Formalism is just a matter of rules, like chess - but then why is it useful in science? [Shapiro]
Deductivism says mathematics is logical consequences of uninterpreted axioms [Shapiro]
Critics resent the way intuitionism cripples mathematics, but it allows new important distinctions [Shapiro]
Numbers do not exist independently; the essence of a number is its relations to other numbers [Shapiro]
A 'system' is related objects; a 'pattern' or 'structure' abstracts the pure relations from them [Shapiro]
The number 3 is presumably identical as a natural, an integer, a rational, a real, and complex [Shapiro]
Two definitions of 3 in terms of sets disagree over whether 1 is a member of 3 [Shapiro]
Categories are the best foundation for mathematics [Shapiro]
Cauchy gave a formal definition of a converging sequence. [Shapiro]