more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 8753

[filed under theme 6. Mathematics / C. Sources of Mathematics / 10. Constructivism / b. Intuitionism ]

Full Idea

Critics commonly complain that the intuitionist restrictions cripple the mathematician. On the other hand, intuitionist mathematics allows for many potentially important distinctions not available in classical mathematics, and is often more subtle.

Gist of Idea

Critics resent the way intuitionism cripples mathematics, but it allows new important distinctions

Source

Stewart Shapiro (Thinking About Mathematics [2000], 7.1)

Book Ref

Shapiro,Stewart: 'Thinking About Mathematics' [OUP 2000], p.174


A Reaction

The main way in which it cripples is its restriction on talk of infinity ('Cantor's heaven'), which was resented by Hilbert. Since high-level infinities are interesting, it would be odd if we were not allowed to discuss them.


The 15 ideas from 'Thinking About Mathematics'

Rationalism tries to apply mathematical methodology to all of knowledge [Shapiro]
'Impredicative' definitions refer to the thing being described [Shapiro]
Intuitionists deny excluded middle, because it is committed to transcendent truth or objects [Shapiro]
Conceptualist are just realists or idealist or nominalists, depending on their view of concepts [Shapiro]
Logicism seems to be a non-starter if (as is widely held) logic has no ontology of its own [Shapiro]
Term Formalism says mathematics is just about symbols - but real numbers have no names [Shapiro]
Game Formalism is just a matter of rules, like chess - but then why is it useful in science? [Shapiro]
Deductivism says mathematics is logical consequences of uninterpreted axioms [Shapiro]
Critics resent the way intuitionism cripples mathematics, but it allows new important distinctions [Shapiro]
Numbers do not exist independently; the essence of a number is its relations to other numbers [Shapiro]
A 'system' is related objects; a 'pattern' or 'structure' abstracts the pure relations from them [Shapiro]
The number 3 is presumably identical as a natural, an integer, a rational, a real, and complex [Shapiro]
Two definitions of 3 in terms of sets disagree over whether 1 is a member of 3 [Shapiro]
Categories are the best foundation for mathematics [Shapiro]
Cauchy gave a formal definition of a converging sequence. [Shapiro]