more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 8757

[filed under theme 6. Mathematics / C. Sources of Mathematics / 1. Mathematical Platonism / a. For mathematical platonism ]

Full Idea

There is one and only one serious argument for the existence of mathematical entities, and that is the Indispensability Argument of Putnam and Quine.

Clarification

The argument is that science requires mathematics

Gist of Idea

The Indispensability Argument is the only serious ground for the existence of mathematical entities

Source

Hartry Field (Science without Numbers [1980], p.5), quoted by Stewart Shapiro - Thinking About Mathematics 9.1

Book Ref

Shapiro,Stewart: 'Thinking About Mathematics' [OUP 2000], p.227


A Reaction

Personally I don't believe (and nor does Field) that this gives a good enough reason to believe in such things. Quine (who likes 'desert landscapes' in ontology) ends up believing that sets are real because of his argument. Not for me.


The 21 ideas from 'Science without Numbers'

In Field's Platonist view, set theory is false because it asserts existence for non-existent things [Field,H, by Chihara]
Logical consequence is defined by the impossibility of P and ¬q [Field,H, by Shapiro]
In Field's version of science, space-time points replace real numbers [Field,H, by Szabó]
The application of mathematics only needs its possibility, not its truth [Field,H, by Shapiro]
Field presumes properties can be eliminated from science [Field,H, by Szabó]
Nominalists try to only refer to physical objects, or language, or mental constructions [Field,H]
Abstract objects are only applicable to the world if they are impure, and connect to the physical [Field,H]
It seems impossible to explain the idea that the conclusion is contained in the premises [Field,H]
Mathematics is only empirical as regards which theory is useful [Field,H]
Abstractions can form useful counterparts to concrete statements [Field,H]
Hilbert explains geometry, by non-numerical facts about space [Field,H]
Relational space is problematic if you take the idea of a field seriously [Field,H]
Both philosophy and physics now make substantivalism more attractive [Field,H]
'Metric' axioms uses functions, points and numbers; 'synthetic' axioms give facts about space [Field,H]
Beneath every extrinsic explanation there is an intrinsic explanation [Field,H]
Field needs a semantical notion of second-order consequence, and that needs sets [Brown,JR on Field,H]
In theories of fields, space-time points or regions are causal agents [Field,H]
'Abstract' is unclear, but numbers, functions and sets are clearly abstract [Field,H]
The Indispensability Argument is the only serious ground for the existence of mathematical entities [Field,H]
You can reduce ontological commitment by expanding the logic [Field,H]
Why regard standard mathematics as truths, rather than as interesting fictions? [Field,H]