more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 8782

[filed under theme 6. Mathematics / C. Sources of Mathematics / 6. Logicism / a. Early logicism ]

Full Idea

Since Frege's defence of his thesis that the laws of arithmetic are analytic depended upon a realm of independently existing objects - the finite cardinal numbers and the real numbers - his view amounted to a Platonist version of logicism.

Gist of Idea

Frege offered a Platonist version of logicism, committed to cardinal and real numbers

Source

report of Gottlob Frege (Grundlagen der Arithmetik (Foundations) [1884]) by B Hale / C Wright - Logicism in the 21st Century 1

Book Ref

'Oxf Handbk of Philosophy of Maths and Logic', ed/tr. Shapiro,Stewart [OUP 2007], p.166


A Reaction

Nice to have this spelled out. Along with Gödel, Frege is the most distinguished Platonist since the great man. Frege has lots of modern fans, but I would have thought that this makes his position a non-starter. Alternatives are needed.


The 33 ideas with the same theme [first developments of the logicist idea]:

Mathematics is close to logic, but is even more abstract [Peirce]
I hold that algebra and number are developments of logic [Jevons]
Arithmetic is a development of logic, so arithmetical symbolism must expand into logical symbolism [Frege]
My Basic Law V is a law of pure logic [Frege]
Logicism shows that no empirical truths are needed to justify arithmetic [Frege, by George/Velleman]
Arithmetic is analytic [Frege, by Weiner]
Frege offered a Platonist version of logicism, committed to cardinal and real numbers [Frege, by Hale/Wright]
Mathematics has no special axioms of its own, but follows from principles of logic (with definitions) [Frege, by Bostock]
Arithmetic must be based on logic, because of its total generality [Frege, by Jeshion]
Numbers are definable in terms of mapping items which fall under concepts [Frege, by Scruton]
Arithmetic is analytic and a priori, and thus it is part of logic [Frege]
The loss of my Rule V seems to make foundations for arithmetic impossible [Frege]
Frege aimed to discover the logical foundations which justify arithmetical judgements [Frege, by Burge]
Eventually Frege tried to found arithmetic in geometry instead of in logic [Frege, by Friend]
Arithmetic can have even simpler logical premises than the Peano Axioms [Russell on Peano]
For Russell, numbers are sets of equivalent sets [Russell, by Benacerraf]
Maths can be deduced from logical axioms and the logic of relations [Russell]
We tried to define all of pure maths using logical premisses and concepts [Russell]
Russell and Whitehead were not realists, but embraced nearly all of maths in logic [Russell/Whitehead, by Friend]
'Principia' lacks a precise statement of the syntax [Gödel on Russell/Whitehead]
Russell and Whitehead took arithmetic to be higher-order logic [Russell/Whitehead, by Hodes]
Pure mathematics is the class of propositions of the form 'p implies q' [Russell]
Logical positivists incorporated geometry into logicism, saying axioms are just definitions [Carnap, by Shapiro]
Questions about numbers are answered by analysis, and are analytic, and hence logically true [Carnap]
Two and one making three has the necessity of logical inference [Wittgenstein]
Maths and logic are true universally because they are analytic or tautological [Ayer]
If mathematics follows from definitions, then it is conventional, and part of logic [Quine]
Logicism is only noteworthy if logic has a privileged position in our ontology and epistemology [Hale/Wright]
Logicists say mathematics can be derived from definitions, and can be known that way [Fine,K]
Russell needed three extra axioms to reduce maths to logic: infinity, choice and reducibility [Grayling]
The task of logicism was to define by logic the concepts 'number', 'successor' and '0' [Linsky,B]
The logicists held that is-a-member-of is a logical constant, making set theory part of logic [Orenstein]
Logicism makes sense of our ability to know arithmetic just by thought [Hofweber]