more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 8792

[filed under theme 13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 4. Foundationalism / f. Foundationalism critique ]

Full Idea

Observational knowledge of any particular fact, e.g. that this is green, presupposes that one knows general facts of the form 'X is a reliable symptom of Y'.

Gist of Idea

Observations like 'this is green' presuppose truths about what is a reliable symptom of what

Source

Wilfrid Sellars (Does Emp.Knowledge have Foundation? [1956], p.123)

Book Ref

'Epistemology - An Anthology', ed/tr. Sosa,E. /Kim,J. [Blackwell 2000], p.123


A Reaction

This is a nicely observed version of the regress problem with justification. I would guess that foundationalists would simply deny that this further knowledge is required; 'this is green' arises out of the experience, but it is not an inference.


The 6 ideas from Wilfrid Sellars

The 'grain problem' says physical objects are granular, where sensations appear not to be [Sellars, by Polger]
The concept of 'green' involves a battery of other concepts [Sellars]
If observation is knowledge, it is not just an experience; it is a justification in the space of reasons [Sellars]
Observations like 'this is green' presuppose truths about what is a reliable symptom of what [Sellars]
Reduction requires that an object's properties consist of its constituents' properties and relations [Sellars]
Philosophy aims to understand how things (broadly understood) hang together (broadly understood) [Sellars]