more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 8815

[filed under theme 13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 10. Anti External Justification ]

Full Idea

External considerations of reliability could not be internalized. Consequently, it is in principle impossible for us to actually employ externalist norms. I take this to be a conclusive refutation of belief externalism.

Clarification

'Norms' are principles guiding actions

Gist of Idea

Belief externalism is false, because external considerations cannot be internalized for actual use

Source

John L. Pollock (Epistemic Norms [1986], 'Ref.of Extern')

Book Ref

'Epistemology - An Anthology', ed/tr. Sosa,E. /Kim,J. [Blackwell 2000], p.197


A Reaction

Not so fast. He earlier rejected the 'intellectualist model' (Idea 8813), so he doesn't think norms have to be fully conscious and open to criticism. So they could be innate, or the result of indoctrination (sorry, teaching), or just forgotten.

Related Idea

Idea 8813 If we have to appeal explicitly to epistemic norms, that will produce an infinite regress [Pollock]


The 7 ideas with the same theme [critiques of the external approach to justification]:

Belief externalism is false, because external considerations cannot be internalized for actual use [Pollock]
Externalism means we have no reason to believe, which is strong scepticism [Bonjour]
Even if there is no obvious irrationality, it may be irrational to base knowledge entirely on external criteria [Bonjour]
In the context of scepticism, externalism does not seem to be an option [Williams,M]
Externalist theories don't explain why knowledge has value [Greco]
Epistemic externalism struggles to capture the idea of epistemic responsibility [Pritchard,D]
Externalism makes the acquisition of knowledge too easy? [Vahid]