more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 8850

[filed under theme 13. Knowledge Criteria / A. Justification Problems / 2. Justification Challenges / a. Agrippa's trilemma ]

Full Idea

Agrippa's Trilemma offers three possible outcomes for a regress of justification: the chain goes on for ever (infinite); or the chain stops at an unjustified proposition (arbitrary); or the chain eventually includes the original proposition (circular).

Gist of Idea

Agrippa's Trilemma: justification is infinite, or ends arbitrarily, or is circular

Source

report of Agrippa (fragments/reports [c.60], §2) by Michael Williams - Without Immediate Justification §2

Book Ref

'Contemporary Debates in Epistemology', ed/tr. Steup,M/Sosa,E [Blackwell 2005], p.205


A Reaction

This summarises Ideas 1911, 1913 and 1914. Agrippa's Trilemma is now a standard starting point for modern discussions of foundations. Personally I reject 2, and am torn between 1 (+ social consensus) and 3 (with a benign, coherent circle).

Related Ideas

Idea 1911 Even if all known nations agree on a practice, there may be unknown nations which disagree [Sext.Empiricus]

Idea 1913 Is virtue taught, or achieved by practice, or a natural aptitude, or what? [Plato]


The 10 ideas with the same theme [all three justification structures look hopeless]:

Parts and wholes are either equally knowable or equally unknowable [Plato]
Without distinguishing marks, how do I know what my beliefs are about? [Plato]
Sceptics say justification is an infinite regress, or it stops at the unknowable [Aristotle]
Agrippa's Trilemma: justification is infinite, or ends arbitrarily, or is circular [Agrippa, by Williams,M]
Sceptics say demonstration depends on self-demonstrating things, or indemonstrable things [Diog. Laertius]
There are five possible responses to the problem of infinite regress in justification [Cleve]
Infinitism avoids a regress, circularity or arbitrariness, by saying warrant just increases [Klein,P]
Foundations are justified by non-beliefs, or circularly, or they need no justification [Dancy,J]
Coherentists say that regress problems are assuming 'linear' justification [Williams,M]
Justification is either unanchored (infinite or circular), or anchored (in knowledge or non-knowledge) [Audi,R]