more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 8856

[filed under theme 10. Modality / D. Knowledge of Modality / 3. A Posteriori Necessary ]

Full Idea

Fifty years ago, Quine convinced everyone who cared that the argument for abstract objects, if there were going to be one, would have to be a posteriori in nature; an argument that numbers, for example, are indispensable entities for 'total science'.

Gist of Idea

Quine's indispensability argument said arguments for abstracta were a posteriori

Source

report of Willard Quine (On What There Is [1948], §1) by Stephen Yablo - Apriority and Existence

Book Ref

'New Essays on the A Priori', ed/tr. Boghossian,P /Peacocke,C [OUP 2000], p.196


A Reaction

This sets the scene for the modern debate on the a priori. The claim that abstractions are indispensable for a factual account of the physical world strikes me as highly implausible.


The 10 ideas with the same theme [knowing what has to be, by means of experience]:

Quine's indispensability argument said arguments for abstracta were a posteriori [Quine, by Yablo]
For Quine the only way to know a necessity is empirically [Quine, by Dancy,J]
Essentialists say natural laws are in a new category: necessary a posteriori [Ellis]
It is necessary that this table is not made of ice, but we don't know it a priori [Kripke]
Kripke has demonstrated that some necessary truths are only knowable a posteriori [Kripke, by Chalmers]
"'Hesperus' is 'Phosphorus'" is necessarily true, if it is true, but not known a priori [Kripke]
Theoretical identities are between rigid designators, and so are necessary a posteriori [Kripke]
How can you show the necessity of an a posteriori necessity, if it might turn out to be false? [Jackson]
Critics say there are just an a priori necessary part, and an a posteriori contingent part [Stalnaker]
The necessary a posteriori is statements either of identity or of essence [Sidelle]