more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 8876

[filed under theme 13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 4. Foundationalism / e. Pro-foundations ]

Full Idea

Much of our propositional knowledge is not easily formulable, as when a witness looking at a police lineup may know what the culprit's face looks like.

Gist of Idea

Much propositional knowledge cannot be formulated, as in recognising a face

Source

Ernest Sosa (Beyond internal Foundations to external Virtues [2003], 6.1)

Book Ref

Bonjour,L/Sosa,E: 'Epistemic Justification' [Blackwells 2003], p.99


A Reaction

This is actually a very helpful defence of foundationalism, because it shows that we will accept perceptual experiences as knowledge when they are not expressed as explicit propositions. Davidson (Idea 8801), for example, must deal with this difficulty.

Related Idea

Idea 8801 Coherent justification says only beliefs can be reasons for holding other beliefs [Davidson]


The 6 ideas with the same theme [support for existence of foundational beliefs]:

The starting point of a proof is not a proof [Aristotle]
Much propositional knowledge cannot be formulated, as in recognising a face [Sosa]
If justification is endless, no link in the chain is ultimately justified [Ginet on Klein,P]
A single belief can trail two regresses, one terminating and one not [Sosa]
The main argument for foundationalism is that all other theories involve a regress leading to scepticism [Bonjour]
The best argument for immediate justification is not the Regress Argument, but considering examples [Pryor]