more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 8889

[filed under theme 13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 3. Reliabilism / a. Reliable knowledge ]

Full Idea

Reliabilist views differ among themselves with regard to whether a belief's being produced in a reliable way is by itself sufficient for epistemic justification or whether there are further requirements that must be satisfied as well.

Gist of Idea

Reliabilists disagree over whether some further requirement is needed to produce knowledge

Source

Laurence Bonjour (A Version of Internalist Foundationalism [2003], 2.1)

Book Ref

Bonjour,L/Sosa,E: 'Epistemic Justification' [Blackwells 2003], p.25


A Reaction

If 'further requirements' are needed, the crucial question would be which one is trumps when they clash. If the further requirements can correct the reliable source, then it cannot any longer be called 'reliabilism'. It's Further-requirement-ism.


The 11 ideas from 'A Version of Internalist Foundationalism'

It is hard to give the concept of 'self-evident' a clear and defensible characterization [Bonjour]
The concept of knowledge is so confused that it is best avoided [Bonjour]
Reliabilists disagree over whether some further requirement is needed to produce knowledge [Bonjour]
If the reliable facts producing a belief are unknown to me, my belief is not rational or responsible [Bonjour]
My incoherent beliefs about art should not undermine my very coherent beliefs about physics [Bonjour]
Coherence seems to justify empirical beliefs about externals when there is no external input [Bonjour]
Coherentists must give a reason why coherent justification is likely to lead to the truth [Bonjour]
For any given area, there seem to be a huge number of possible coherent systems of beliefs [Bonjour]
If neither the first-level nor the second-level is itself conscious, there seems to be no consciousness present [Bonjour]
Conscious states have built-in awareness of content, so we know if a conceptual description of it is correct [Bonjour]
The adverbial account will still be needed when a mind apprehends its sense-data [Bonjour]