more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 8899

[filed under theme 13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 9. Naturalised Epistemology ]

Full Idea

Epistemology falls into place as a chapter of psychology, and hence of natural science. ..We study meagre input and torrential output, to see how evidence relates to theory, and in what ways one's theory of nature transcends any available evidence.

Gist of Idea

Epistemology is a part of psychology, studying how our theories relate to our evidence

Source

Willard Quine (Epistemology Naturalized [1968], p.83)

Book Ref

Quine,Willard: 'Ontological Relativity and Other Essays' [Columbia 1969], p.83


A Reaction

It depends what you are interested in. If you just want to know what makes humans tick, then Quine is your man, but if you want to know things in general, and want to know how to get it right, then the normative side of epistemology is unavoidable.


The 8 ideas from 'Epistemology Naturalized'

You can't reduce epistemology to psychology, because that presupposes epistemology [Maund on Quine]
We should abandon a search for justification or foundations, and focus on how knowledge is acquired [Quine, by Davidson]
If we abandon justification and normativity in epistemology, we must also abandon knowledge [Kim on Quine]
Without normativity, naturalized epistemology isn't even about beliefs [Kim on Quine]
Mathematics reduces to set theory (which is a bit vague and unobvious), but not to logic proper [Quine]
Inculcations of meanings of words rests ultimately on sensory evidence [Quine]
Epistemology is a part of psychology, studying how our theories relate to our evidence [Quine]
In observation sentences, we could substitute community acceptance for analyticity [Quine]