more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 8926

[filed under theme 6. Mathematics / B. Foundations for Mathematics / 7. Mathematical Structuralism / e. Structuralism critique ]

Full Idea

The identification of mathematical objects with positions in structures rests upon the prior credibility of the thesis that positions are objects in their own right.

Gist of Idea

For mathematical objects to be positions, positions themselves must exist first

Source

Fraser MacBride (Structuralism Reconsidered [2007], §3)

Book Ref

'Oxf Handbk of Philosophy of Maths and Logic', ed/tr. Shapiro,Stewart [OUP 2007], p.585


A Reaction

Sounds devastating, but something has to get the whole thing off the ground. This is why Resnik's word 'patterns' is so appealing. Patterns stare you in the face, and they don't change if all the objects making it up are replaced by others.


The 25 ideas from Fraser MacBride

'Multigrade' relations are those lacking a fixed number of relata [MacBride]
It may be that internal relations like proportion exist, because we directly perceive it [MacBride]
Internal relations are fixed by existences, or characters, or supervenience on characters [MacBride]
Numbers are identified by their main properties and relations, involving the successor function [MacBride]
For mathematical objects to be positions, positions themselves must exist first [MacBride]
If truthmaking is classical entailment, then anything whatsoever makes a necessary truth [MacBride]
Different types of 'grounding' seem to have no more than a family resemblance relation [MacBride]
Which has priority - 'grounding' or 'truth-making'? [MacBride]
'Maximalism' says every truth has an actual truthmaker [MacBride]
Does 'this sentence has no truth-maker' have a truth-maker? Reductio suggests it can't have [MacBride]
Russell allows some complex facts, but Wittgenstein only allows atomic facts [MacBride]
'A is F' may not be positive ('is dead'), and 'A is not-F' may not be negative ('is not blind') [MacBride]
There are different types of truthmakers for different types of negative truth [MacBride]
There aren't enough positive states out there to support all the negative truths [MacBride]
Wittgenstein's plan to show there is only logical necessity failed, because of colours [MacBride]
Maybe it only exists if it is a truthmaker (rather than the value of a variable)? [MacBride]
Optimalists say that negative and universal are true 'by default' from the positive truths [MacBride]
Maximalism follows Russell, and optimalism (no negative or universal truthmakers) follows Wittgenstein [MacBride]
The main idea of truth-making is that what a proposition is about is what matters [MacBride]
Phenomenalists, behaviourists and presentists can't supply credible truth-makers [MacBride]
Even idealists could accept truthmakers, as mind-dependent [MacBride]
We might define truth as arising from the truth-maker relation [MacBride]
Maybe 'makes true' is not an active verb, but just a formal connective like 'because'? [MacBride]
Connectives link sentences without linking their meanings [MacBride]
Truthmaker talk of 'something' making sentences true, which presupposes objectual quantification [MacBride]