more from this thinker     |     more from this text

Single Idea 8986

[filed under theme 7. Existence / E. Categories / 2. Categorisation ]

Full Idea

We must reject the classical picture of classification by pigeon-holes, and think in other terms: classifying can be, and often is, clustering round paradigms.

Gist of Idea

We should abandon classifying by pigeon-holes, and classify around paradigms

Source

Mark Sainsbury (Concepts without Boundaries [1990], §8)

Book Ref

'Vagueness: a Reader', ed/tr. Keefe,R /Smith,P [MIT 1999], p.264

A Reaction

His conclusion to a discussion of the problem of vagueness, where it is identified with concepts which have no boundaries. Pigeon-holes are a nice exemplar of the Enlightenment desire to get everything right. I prefer Aristotle's categories, Idea 3311.

Related Idea

Idea 3311 The categories (substance, quality, quantity, relation, action, passion, place, time) peter out inconsequentially [Benardete,JA on Aristotle]

The 17 ideas with the same theme [how the mind approaches putting things into categories]:

13775 We only succeed in cutting if we use appropriate tools, not if we approach it randomly [Plato]
16121 I revere anyone who can discern a single thing that encompasses many things [Plato]
13435 We can't categorise things by their real essences, because these are unknown [Locke]
12535 If we discovered real essences, we would still categorise things by the external appearance [Locke]
6160 Does Kant say the mind imposes categories, or that it restricts us to them? [Rowlands on Kant]
22649 Classification can only ever be for a particular purpose [James]
4048 Infant brains appear to have inbuilt ontological categories [Goldman]
8986 We should abandon classifying by pigeon-holes, and classify around paradigms [Sainsbury]
17376 We should aim for a classification which tells us as much as possible about the object [Dupré]
4913 Brain lesions can erase whole categories of perception, suggesting they are hard-wired [Carter,R]
15682 Even fairly simple animals make judgements based on categories [Gelman]
15691 Children accept real stable categories, with nonobvious potential that gives causal explanations [Gelman]
13131 The aim is that everything should belong in some ontological category or other [Westerhoff]
10494 Several words may label a category; one word can name several categories; some categories lack words [Ellen]
18573 For each category of objects (such as 'dog') an individual seems to have several concepts [Machery]
18602 A thing is classified if its features are likely to be generated by that category's causal laws [Machery]
18604 Are quick and slow categorisation the same process, or quite different? [Machery]