more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 8999

[filed under theme 5. Theory of Logic / C. Ontology of Logic / 4. Logic by Convention ]

Full Idea

If logic is to proceed mediately from conventions, logic is needed for inferring logic from the conventions. Conventions for adopting logical primitives can only be communicated by free use of those very idioms.

Gist of Idea

Logic isn't conventional, because logic is needed to infer logic from conventions

Source

Willard Quine (Truth by Convention [1935], p.104)

Book Ref

Quine,Willard: 'Ways of Paradox and other essays' [Harvard 1976], p.104


A Reaction

A common pattern of modern argument, which always seems to imply that nothing can ever get off the ground. I suspect that there are far more benign circles in the world of thought than most philosophers imagine.


The 8 ideas with the same theme [logic is just a set of rules and concepts agreed by people]:

Each person is free to build their own logic, just by specifying a syntax [Carnap]
Laws of logic are like laws of chess - if you change them, it's just a different game [Wittgenstein]
If the result is bad, we change the rule; if we like the rule, we reject the result [Goodman]
Logic needs general conventions, but that needs logic to apply them to individual cases [Quine, by Rey]
Claims that logic and mathematics are conventional are either empty, uninteresting, or false [Quine]
Logic isn't conventional, because logic is needed to infer logic from conventions [Quine]
If a convention cannot be communicated until after its adoption, what is its role? [Quine]
Maybe conventionalism applies to meaning, but not to the truth of propositions expressed [Hale]