more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 9117

[filed under theme 5. Theory of Logic / L. Paradox / 6. Paradoxes in Language / b. The Heap paradox ('Sorites') ]

Full Idea

Hart argues that the smallest heap consists of four objects: three on the bottom, one on the top.

Gist of Idea

The smallest heap has four objects: three on the bottom, one on the top

Source

report of William D. Hart (Hat-Tricks and Heaps [1992]) by Roy Sorensen - Vagueness and Contradiction Intro

Book Ref

Sorensen,Roy: 'Vagueness and Contradiction' [OUP 2004], p.2


A Reaction

If the objects were rough bolders, you could get away with two on the bottom. He's wrong. No one would accept as a 'heap' four minute grains barely visible to the naked eye. No one would describe such a group of items in a supermarket as a heap.


The 6 ideas with the same theme [problem with defining what makes a heap]:

Zeno is wrong that one grain of millet makes a sound; why should one grain achieve what the whole bushel does? [Aristotle on Zeno of Elea]
Removing one grain doesn't destroy a heap, so a heap can't be destroyed [Eubulides, by Dancy,R]
Surely there is no exact single grain that brings a heap into existence [Dummett]
There are no heaps [Inwagen]
The smallest heap has four objects: three on the bottom, one on the top [Hart,WD, by Sorensen]
A sorites stops when it collides with an opposite sorites [Williamson]