more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 9121

[filed under theme 13. Knowledge Criteria / D. Scepticism / 3. Illusion Scepticism ]

Full Idea

Philosophers tend to associate illusions with skepticism. But since illusions are signs of modular construction, they are actually reason for scientific hope. Illusions have been very useful in helping us to understand vision.

Gist of Idea

Illusions are not a reason for skepticism, but a source of interesting scientific information

Source

Roy Sorensen (Vagueness and Contradiction [2001], 1.4)

Book Ref

Sorensen,Roy: 'Vagueness and Contradiction' [OUP 2004], p.38


A Reaction

This is a nice reversal of the usual view. If I see double, it reveals to me that my eyes are not aligned properly. Anyone led to scepticism by illusions should pay more attention to themselves, and less to the reality they hope to know directly.


The 20 ideas from Roy Sorensen

No attempt to deny bivalence has ever been accepted [Sorensen]
Vague words have hidden boundaries [Sorensen]
The colour bands of the spectrum arise from our biology; they do not exist in the physics [Sorensen]
Illusions are not a reason for skepticism, but a source of interesting scientific information [Sorensen]
Banning self-reference would outlaw 'This very sentence is in English' [Sorensen]
If nothing exists, no truthmakers could make 'Nothing exists' true [Sorensen]
Which toothbrush is the truthmaker for 'buy one, get one free'? [Sorensen]
God cannot experience unwanted pain, so God cannot understand human beings [Sorensen]
Denying problems, or being romantically defeated by them, won't make them go away [Sorensen]
We are unable to perceive a nose (on the back of a mask) as concave [Sorensen]
Bayesians build near-certainty from lots of reasonably probable beliefs [Sorensen]
It is propositional attitudes which can be a priori, not the propositions themselves [Sorensen]
Attributing apriority to a proposition is attributing a cognitive ability to someone [Sorensen]
I can buy any litre of water, but not every litre of water [Sorensen]
Two long understandable sentences can have an unintelligible conjunction [Sorensen]
An offer of 'free coffee or juice' could slowly shift from exclusive 'or' to inclusive 'or' [Sorensen]
Propositions are what settle problems of ambiguity in sentences [Sorensen]
The negation of a meaningful sentence must itself be meaningful [Sorensen]
We now see that generalizations use variables rather than abstract entities [Sorensen]
The paradox of analysis says that any conceptual analysis must be either trivial or false [Sorensen]