more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 9129

[filed under theme 25. Social Practice / A. Freedoms / 4. Free market ]

Full Idea

I am entitled to buy any litre of water, but I am not entitled to buy every litre of water.

Gist of Idea

I can buy any litre of water, but not every litre of water

Source

Roy Sorensen (Vagueness and Contradiction [2001], 6.3)

Book Ref

Sorensen,Roy: 'Vagueness and Contradiction' [OUP 2004], p.100


A Reaction

A decent social system must somehow draw a line between buying up all the water and buying up all the paintings of Vermeer. Even the latter seems wicked, but it is hard to pin down the reason.


The 10 ideas with the same theme [extent to which citizens can feely trade]:

Kant is the father of the notion of exploitation as an evil [Kant, by Berlin]
Communism abolishes private property and dissolves the powerful world market [Marx/Engels]
Hayek was a liberal, but mainly concerned with market freedom [Hayek, by Dunt]
Impeding the market is likely to lead to extensive state control [Hayek]
If people hold things legitimately, just distribution is simply the result of free exchanges [Nozick, by Kymlicka]
Libertarians like the free market, but they also think that the free market is just [Kymlicka]
I can buy any litre of water, but not every litre of water [Sorensen]
Market prices indicate shortages and gluts, and where the profits are to be made [Wolff,J]
No market is free of political bias, and markets need protection of their freedoms [Harari]
A 'free' society implies a free market, which always produces predatory capitalism and inequalities [Gopnik]