more on this theme     |     more from this text

Single Idea 9131

[filed under theme 2. Reason / B. Laws of Thought / 1. Laws of Thought ]

Full Idea

If there is an upper bound on the length of understandable sentences, then two understandable sentences can have an unintelligible conjunction.

Gist of Idea

Two long understandable sentences can have an unintelligible conjunction

Source

Roy Sorensen (Vagueness and Contradiction [2001], 6.4)

Book Ref

Sorensen,Roy: 'Vagueness and Contradiction' [OUP 2004], p.101

A Reaction

Not a huge paradox about the use of the word 'and', perhaps, but a nice little warning to be clear about what is being claimed before you cheerfully assert a screamingly obvious law of thought, such as conjunction.

The 20 ideas from Roy Sorensen

9119 No attempt to deny bivalence has ever been accepted [Sorensen]
9116 Vague words have hidden boundaries [Sorensen]
9118 The colour bands of the spectrum arise from our biology; they do not exist in the physics [Sorensen]
9121 Illusions are not a reason for skepticism, but a source of interesting scientific information [Sorensen]
9137 Banning self-reference would outlaw 'This very sentence is in English' [Sorensen]
9139 If nothing exists, no truthmakers could make 'Nothing exists' true [Sorensen]
9140 Which toothbrush is the truthmaker for 'buy one, get one free'? [Sorensen]
9122 God cannot experience unwanted pain, so God cannot understand human beings [Sorensen]
9125 Denying problems, or being romantically defeated by them, won't make them go away [Sorensen]
9124 We are unable to perceive a nose (on the back of a mask) as concave [Sorensen]
9126 Bayesians build near-certainty from lots of reasonably probable beliefs [Sorensen]
9128 It is propositional attitudes which can be a priori, not the propositions themselves [Sorensen]
9130 Attributing apriority to a proposition is attributing a cognitive ability to someone [Sorensen]
9129 I can buy any litre of water, but not every litre of water [Sorensen]
9131 Two long understandable sentences can have an unintelligible conjunction [Sorensen]
9132 An offer of 'free coffee or juice' could slowly shift from exclusive 'or' to inclusive 'or' [Sorensen]
9133 Propositions are what settle problems of ambiguity in sentences [Sorensen]
9134 The negation of a meaningful sentence must itself be meaningful [Sorensen]
9135 We now see that generalizations use variables rather than abstract entities [Sorensen]
9136 The paradox of analysis says that any conceptual analysis must be either trivial or false [Sorensen]