more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 9140

[filed under theme 3. Truth / B. Truthmakers / 12. Rejecting Truthmakers ]

Full Idea

If I buy two toothbrushes on a 'buy one, get one free' offer, which one did I buy and which one did I get free? Those who believe that each contingent truth has a truthmaker are forced to believe that 'buy one, get one free' is false.

Gist of Idea

Which toothbrush is the truthmaker for 'buy one, get one free'?

Source

Roy Sorensen (Vagueness and Contradiction [2001], 11.6)

Book Ref

Sorensen,Roy: 'Vagueness and Contradiction' [OUP 2004], p.183


A Reaction

Nice. There really is no fact of which toothbrush is the free one. The underlying proposition must presumably be 'two for the price of one'. But you could hardly fault the first slogan under the Trades Descriptions Act.


The 20 ideas from 'Vagueness and Contradiction'

No attempt to deny bivalence has ever been accepted [Sorensen]
Vague words have hidden boundaries [Sorensen]
The colour bands of the spectrum arise from our biology; they do not exist in the physics [Sorensen]
Illusions are not a reason for skepticism, but a source of interesting scientific information [Sorensen]
Banning self-reference would outlaw 'This very sentence is in English' [Sorensen]
If nothing exists, no truthmakers could make 'Nothing exists' true [Sorensen]
Which toothbrush is the truthmaker for 'buy one, get one free'? [Sorensen]
God cannot experience unwanted pain, so God cannot understand human beings [Sorensen]
Denying problems, or being romantically defeated by them, won't make them go away [Sorensen]
We are unable to perceive a nose (on the back of a mask) as concave [Sorensen]
Bayesians build near-certainty from lots of reasonably probable beliefs [Sorensen]
It is propositional attitudes which can be a priori, not the propositions themselves [Sorensen]
Attributing apriority to a proposition is attributing a cognitive ability to someone [Sorensen]
I can buy any litre of water, but not every litre of water [Sorensen]
Two long understandable sentences can have an unintelligible conjunction [Sorensen]
An offer of 'free coffee or juice' could slowly shift from exclusive 'or' to inclusive 'or' [Sorensen]
Propositions are what settle problems of ambiguity in sentences [Sorensen]
The negation of a meaningful sentence must itself be meaningful [Sorensen]
We now see that generalizations use variables rather than abstract entities [Sorensen]
The paradox of analysis says that any conceptual analysis must be either trivial or false [Sorensen]