more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 9170

[filed under theme 19. Language / B. Reference / 3. Direct Reference / c. Social reference ]

Full Idea

Traditional semantic theory leaves out two contributions to the determination of reference - the contribution of society and the contribution of the real world; a better semantic theory must encompass both.

Gist of Idea

We need to recognise the contribution of society and of the world in determining reference

Source

Hilary Putnam (Meaning and Reference [1973], p.161)

Book Ref

'Meaning and Reference', ed/tr. Moore,A.W. [OUP 1993], p.161


A Reaction

I strongly agree that there is a social aspect to reference-fixing, but I am much more dubious about the world 'determining' anything. The whole of his Twin Earth point could be mopped up by a social account, with 'experts' as the key idea.


The 12 ideas with the same theme [reference fixed by persons beyond the speaker]:

For the correct reference of complex ideas, we can only refer to experts [Locke]
A word's meaning is the thing conceived, as fixed by linguistic experts [Reid]
Reference is mainly a social phenomenon [Strawson,P, by Sainsbury]
We need to recognise the contribution of society and of the world in determining reference [Putnam]
Maybe the total mental state of a language community fixes the reference of a term [Putnam]
Neither individual nor community mental states fix reference [Putnam]
Reference (say to 'elms') is a social phenomenon which we can leave to experts [Putnam]
Aristotle implies that we have the complete concepts of a language in our heads, but we don't [Putnam]
Kripke makes reference a largely social matter, external to the mind of the speaker [Kripke, by McGinn]
Kripke's theory is important because it gives a collective account of reference [Kripke, by Putnam]
We refer through the community, going back to the original referent [Kripke]
A description may fix a reference even when it is not true of its object [Kripke]