more from this thinker | more from this text
Full Idea
Traditional semantic theory leaves out two contributions to the determination of reference - the contribution of society and the contribution of the real world; a better semantic theory must encompass both.
Gist of Idea
We need to recognise the contribution of society and of the world in determining reference
Source
Hilary Putnam (Meaning and Reference [1973], p.161)
Book Ref
'Meaning and Reference', ed/tr. Moore,A.W. [OUP 1993], p.161
A Reaction
I strongly agree that there is a social aspect to reference-fixing, but I am much more dubious about the world 'determining' anything. The whole of his Twin Earth point could be mopped up by a social account, with 'experts' as the key idea.
12524 | For the correct reference of complex ideas, we can only refer to experts [Locke] |
23645 | A word's meaning is the thing conceived, as fixed by linguistic experts [Reid] |
10430 | Reference is mainly a social phenomenon [Strawson,P, by Sainsbury] |
9170 | We need to recognise the contribution of society and of the world in determining reference [Putnam] |
14201 | Maybe the total mental state of a language community fixes the reference of a term [Putnam] |
14202 | Neither individual nor community mental states fix reference [Putnam] |
2338 | Reference (say to 'elms') is a social phenomenon which we can leave to experts [Putnam] |
2339 | Aristotle implies that we have the complete concepts of a language in our heads, but we don't [Putnam] |
4689 | Kripke makes reference a largely social matter, external to the mind of the speaker [Kripke, by McGinn] |
17504 | Kripke's theory is important because it gives a collective account of reference [Kripke, by Putnam] |
17035 | We refer through the community, going back to the original referent [Kripke] |
4956 | A description may fix a reference even when it is not true of its object [Kripke] |