more on this theme | more from this thinker
Full Idea
The function of names is simply to refer.
Gist of Idea
The function of names is simply to refer
Source
Saul A. Kripke (Identity and Necessity [1971], p.167)
Book Ref
'Meaning and Reference', ed/tr. Moore,A.W. [OUP 1993], p.167
A Reaction
This is Kripke reverting to the John Stuart Mill view of names. If I say "you are a right Casanova" I don't simply refer to Casanova. In notorious examples like 'Homer' reference is fine, but the object of reference is a bit elusive.
9172 | A 'rigid designator' designates the same object in all possible worlds [Kripke] |
9171 | The function of names is simply to refer [Kripke] |
9173 | We cannot say that Nixon might have been a different man from the one he actually was [Kripke] |
9174 | It is necessary that this table is not made of ice, but we don't know it a priori [Kripke] |
9175 | We may fix the reference of 'Cicero' by a description, but thereafter the name is rigid [Kripke] |
9176 | Modal statements about this table never refer to counterparts; that confuses epistemology and metaphysics [Kripke] |
9177 | Identity theorists must deny that pains can be imagined without brain states [Kripke] |
9178 | Pain, unlike heat, is picked out by an essential property [Kripke] |