more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 9173

[filed under theme 10. Modality / E. Possible worlds / 3. Transworld Objects / b. Rigid designation ]

Full Idea

It seems that we cannot say "Nixon might have been a different man from the man he in fact was", unless we mean it metaphorically. He might have been a different sort of person.

Gist of Idea

We cannot say that Nixon might have been a different man from the one he actually was

Source

Saul A. Kripke (Identity and Necessity [1971], p.176)

Book Ref

'Meaning and Reference', ed/tr. Moore,A.W. [OUP 1993], p.176


A Reaction

The problem is that being a 'different sort of person' could become more and more drastic, till Nixon is unrecognisable. I don't see how I can stipulate that a small and dim mouse is Richard Nixon, even in a possible world with magicians.


The 22 ideas with the same theme [items with fixed identity in all possible worlds]:

A rigid designator (for all possible worlds) picks out an object by its essential traits [Quine]
In possible worlds, names are just neutral unvarying pegs for truths and predicates [Marcus (Barcan)]
A 'rigid designator' designates the same object in all possible worlds [Kripke]
We cannot say that Nixon might have been a different man from the one he actually was [Kripke]
Test for rigidity by inserting into the sentence 'N might not have been N' [Kripke, by Lycan]
Kripke avoids difficulties of transworld identity by saying it is a decision, not a discovery [Kripke, by Jacquette]
Saying that natural kinds are 'rigid designators' is the same as saying they are 'indexical' [Kripke, by Putnam]
If Kripke names must still denote a thing in a non-actual situation, the statue isn't its clay [Gibbard on Kripke]
A rigid expression may refer at a world to an object not existing in that world [Kripke, by Sainsbury]
We do not begin with possible worlds and place objects in them; we begin with objects in the real world [Kripke]
It is a necessary truth that Elizabeth II was the child of two particular parents [Kripke]
Kaplan's 'Dthat' is a useful operator for transforming a description into a rigid designation [Kripke]
Possibilities for an individual can only refer to that individual, in some possible world [Plantinga, by Mackie,P]
Rigid designators can be meaningful even if empty [Evans, by Mackie,P]
Identity across possible worlds is prior to rigid designation [Brody]
Rigid designation seems to presuppose that differing worlds contain the same individuals [Stalnaker]
Kripke's semantics needs lots of intuitions about which properties are essential [Gibbard]
It doesn't take the whole of a possible Humphrey to win the election [Lewis]
A logically determinate name names the same thing in every possible world [Lewis]
Rigid designation has at least three essentialist presuppositions [Oderberg]
A thing doesn't need transworld identity prior to rigid reference - that could be a convention of the reference [Sidelle]
'Dthat' operates to make a singular term into a rigid term [Sidelle]