more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 9277

[filed under theme 24. Political Theory / D. Ideologies / 6. Liberalism / g. Liberalism critique ]

Full Idea

Rawls's account of justice works only with widely accepted intuitions of fairness and relies at no point on controversial positions in ethics. The fruit of this modesty is a pious commentary on conventional moral beliefs.

Gist of Idea

Rawls's account of justice relies on conventional fairness, avoiding all moral controversy

Source

comment on John Rawls (A Theory of Justice [1972]) by John Gray - Straw Dogs 3.6

Book Ref

Gray,John: 'Straw Dogs' [Granta 2002], p.102


A Reaction

Presumably this is the thought which provoked Nozick to lob his grenade on the subject. It resembles the charges of Schopenhauer and Nietzsche against Kant, that he was just dressing up conventional morality. Are 'controversial' ethics good?


The 24 ideas with the same theme [difficulties for liberal theory]:

The human race matters, and individuals have little importance [Hegel]
Liberals want the right to be separate, rather than for people to be united [Marx]
The creation of institutions needs a determination which is necessarily anti-liberal [Nietzsche]
Liberalism's weakness is its powerful rigid bureaucracy [Gramsci]
Rawls's account of justice relies on conventional fairness, avoiding all moral controversy [Gray on Rawls]
My Anarchy, State and Utopia neglected our formal social ties and concerns [Nozick on Nozick]
Liberals debate how conservative or radical to be, but don't question their basics [MacIntyre]
Autonomy favours present opinions over future ones, and says nothing about the interests of potential people [Glover]
If a whole community did not mind death, respect for autonomy suggests that you could kill them all [Glover]
Marxists say liberalism is unjust, because it allows exploitation in the sale of labour [Kymlicka]
Ecologism is often non-liberal, by claiming to know other people's best interests [Dobson]
Can individualist theories justify an obligation to fight in a war? [Avineri/De-Shalit]
Liberal justice ignores desert, which is the essence of justice [Kekes]
Liberal distribution cares more about recipients than donors [Kekes]
Why do liberals not see a much wider range of values as basic? [Kekes]
Liberals ignore contingency, and think people are good and equal, and institutions cause evil [Kekes]
Liberalism may fail because it neglects the shared nature of what we pursue and protect [Haldane]
Liberals mistakenly think individuals choose their values, without reference to the community [Swift]
Liberalism should not make assumptions such as the value of choosing your own life plan [Shorten]
Right-wingers attack liberal faith in reason, left-wingers attack its faith in reform [Gopnik]
Cosmopolitan liberals lack national loyalty, and welcome excessive immigration [Gopnik]
Modern left-wingers criticise liberalism's control of culture [Gopnik]
Liberalism's attempt to be neutral and colour-blind erases cultural identities [Gopnik]
Laissez-faire liberalism failed to give people the protections and freedoms needed for a good life [Dunt]