more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 9353

[filed under theme 12. Knowledge Sources / A. A Priori Knowledge / 9. A Priori from Concepts ]

Full Idea

We have no need to turn to an a priori explanation of our knowledge of mathematics and logic. Our intuitions that this knowledge is not justified in some direct empirical way is preserved. It is justified in an indirect holistic way.

Gist of Idea

We explain away a priori knowledge, not as directly empirical, but as indirectly holistically empirical

Source

Michael Devitt (There is no a Priori [2005], §2)

Book Ref

'Contemporary Debates in Epistemology', ed/tr. Steup,M/Sosa,E [Blackwell 2005], p.107


A Reaction

I think this is roughly the right story, but the only way it will work is if we have some sort of theory of abstraction, which gets us up the ladder of generalisations to the ones which, it appears, are necessarily true.


The 15 ideas with the same theme [a priori knowledge only arises from our concepts]:

To name something, you must already have an idea of what it is [Epicurus, by Diog. Laertius]
Relations of ideas are known by thought, independently from the world [Hume]
For Kant analytic knowledge needs complex concepts, but the a priori can rest on the simple [Coffa on Kant]
With large numbers it is obvious that we could never find the sum by analysing the concepts [Kant]
A priori intuitions can only concern the objects of our senses [Kant]
All a priori knowledge deals with the relations of universals [Russell]
We can know some general propositions by universals, when no instance can be given [Russell]
We explain away a priori knowledge, not as directly empirical, but as indirectly holistically empirical [Devitt]
A priori knowledge is analytic - the structure of our concepts - and hence unimportant [Papineau]
Knowledge is a priori if the experience giving you the concepts thus gives you the knowledge [Kitcher]
Meanings and concepts cannot give a priori knowledge, because they may be unacceptable [Horwich]
If we stipulate the meaning of 'number' to make Hume's Principle true, we first need Hume's Principle [Horwich]
Red and green being exclusive colours seems to be rationally graspable but not analytic [Audi,R]
The concepts needed for a priori thought may come from experience [Audi,R]
Examining accurate, justified or grounded concepts brings understanding of the world [Jenkins]