more on this theme
|
more from this thinker
Single Idea 9383
[filed under theme 12. Knowledge Sources / A. A Priori Knowledge / 8. A Priori as Analytic
]
Full Idea
Quine showed the vacuity of the metaphysical concept of analyticity and the futility of the underwritten project - the linguistic theory of necessity. But that doesn't effect the epistemic notion of analyticity needed for a priori knowledge.
Gist of Idea
Metaphysical analyticity (and linguistic necessity) are hopeless, but epistemic analyticity is a priori
Source
comment on Willard Quine (Two Dogmas of Empiricism [1953]) by Paul Boghossian - Analyticity Reconsidered Concl
Book Ref
-: 'Nous' [-], p.20
A Reaction
This summarise Boghossian's view, that a priori knowledge is still analytic, once we get clear about analyticity. See Idea 9368 for his two types of analyticity. Horwich attacks the view.
Related Idea
Idea 9368
Epistemological analyticity: grasp of meaning is justification; metaphysical: truth depends on meaning [Boghossian]
The
29 ideas
from 'Two Dogmas of Empiricism'
12188
|
Contrary to some claims, Quine does not deny logical necessity
[Quine, by McFetridge]
|
15090
|
Quine's attack on the analytic-synthetic distinction undermined necessary truths
[Quine, by Shoemaker]
|
9383
|
Metaphysical analyticity (and linguistic necessity) are hopeless, but epistemic analyticity is a priori
[Boghossian on Quine]
|
12424
|
Quine challenges the claim that analytic truths are knowable a priori
[Quine, by Kitcher]
|
9338
|
Quine's objections to a priori knowledge only work in the domain of science
[Horwich on Quine]
|
9337
|
Science is empirical, simple and conservative; any belief can hence be abandoned; so no a priori
[Quine, by Horwich]
|
9340
|
Logic, arithmetic and geometry are revisable and a posteriori; quantum logic could be right
[Horwich on Quine]
|
17738
|
Quine blurs the difference between knowledge of arithmetic and of physics
[Jenkins on Quine]
|
19492
|
Quine is hopeless circular, deriving ontology from what is literal, and 'literal' from good ontology
[Yablo on Quine]
|
19488
|
The second dogma is linking every statement to some determinate observations
[Quine, by Yablo]
|
7317
|
'Renate' and 'cordate' have identical extensions, but are not synonymous
[Quine, by Miller,A]
|
9366
|
Quine's attack on analyticity undermined linguistic views of necessity, and analytic views of the a priori
[Quine, by Boghossian]
|
14473
|
Quine attacks the Fregean idea that we can define analyticity through synonyous substitution
[Quine, by Thomasson]
|
7321
|
The last two parts of 'Two Dogmas' are much the best
[Miller,A on Quine]
|
8803
|
Erasing the analytic/synthetic distinction got rid of meanings, and saved philosophy of language
[Davidson on Quine]
|
17737
|
The analytic needs excessively small units of meaning and empirical confirmation
[Quine, by Jenkins]
|
9204
|
Quine's arguments fail because he naively conflates names with descriptions
[Fine,K on Quine]
|
9371
|
Analytic statements are either logical truths (all reinterpretations) or they depend on synonymy
[Quine]
|
10929
|
Aristotelian essence of the object has become the modern essence of meaning
[Quine]
|
1620
|
Empiricism makes a basic distinction between truths based or not based on facts
[Quine]
|
1621
|
Once meaning and reference are separated, meaning ceases to seem important
[Quine]
|
1622
|
Did someone ever actually define 'bachelor' as 'unmarried man'?
[Quine]
|
1623
|
Definition rests on synonymy, rather than explaining it
[Quine]
|
1624
|
If we try to define analyticity by synonymy, that leads back to analyticity
[Quine]
|
1625
|
Statements about the external world face the tribunal of sense experience as a corporate body
[Quine]
|
1626
|
It is troublesome nonsense to split statements into a linguistic and a factual component
[Quine]
|
1627
|
Any statement can be held true if we make enough adjustment to the rest of the system
[Quine]
|
1628
|
If physical objects are a myth, they are useful for making sense of experience
[Quine]
|
1629
|
Our outer beliefs must match experience, and our inner ones must be simple
[Quine]
|