more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 9437

[filed under theme 26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 8. Scientific Essentialism / d. Knowing essences ]

Full Idea

Where properties are possessed by all kind members, we must distinguish the accidental from essential ones by considering all actual and possible kind members.

Gist of Idea

To distinguish accidental from essential properties, we must include possible members of kinds

Source

Stephen Mumford (Laws in Nature [2004], 07.5)

Book Ref

Mumford,Stephen: 'Laws in Nature' [Routledge 2006], p.117


A Reaction

This is why we must treat possibilities as features of the actual world.


The 15 ideas with the same theme [whether we can know essences, and if so, how]:

Scientists must know the essential attributes of the things they study [Aristotle]
No one even knows the nature and properties of a fly - why it has that colour, or so many feet [Bacon,R]
We identify substances by supposing that groups of sensations arise from an essence [Locke]
Other spirits may exceed us in knowledge, by knowing the inward constitution of things [Locke]
By digging deeper into the axioms we approach the essence of sciences, and unity of knowedge [Hilbert]
Real essences are scientifically knowable, but so are non-essential properties [Copi]
Without general principles, we couldn't predict the behaviour of dispositional properties [Ellis]
Essentialism requires a clear separation of semantics, epistemology and ontology [Ellis]
It looks as if the immutability of the powers of a property imply essentiality [Shoemaker]
Science searches basic structures in search of essences [Kripke]
Find the essence by varying an object, to see what remains invariable [Velarde-Mayol]
Some dispositions are so far unknown, until we learn how to manifest them [Mumford]
To distinguish accidental from essential properties, we must include possible members of kinds [Mumford]
Essentialism starts from richly structured categories, leading to a search for underlying properties [Gelman]
If flame colour is characteristic of a metal, that is an empirical claim needing justification [Bird]