more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 9455

[filed under theme 5. Theory of Logic / F. Referring in Logic / 1. Naming / b. Names as descriptive ]

Full Idea

Some say that proper names have no descriptive content, but others think that although a name does not have the right sort of descriptive content which fixes a unique referent, it has a content which fixes the sort or category to which it belongs.

Gist of Idea

Maybe proper names have the content of fixing a thing's category

Source

George Bealer (Propositions [1998], §7)

Book Ref

'Philosophy of Logic: an anthology', ed/tr. Jacquette,Dale [Blackwell 2002], p.130


A Reaction

Presumably 'Mary', and 'Felix', and 'Rover', and 'Smallville' are cases in point. There is a well known journalist called 'Manchester', a famous man called 'Hilary', a village in Hertfordshire called 'Matching Tie'... Interesting, though.


The 5 ideas from 'Propositions'

Sentences saying the same with the same rigid designators may still express different propositions [Bealer]
Propositions might be reduced to functions (worlds to truth values), or ordered sets of properties and relations [Bealer]
Modal logic and brain science have reaffirmed traditional belief in propositions [Bealer]
The four leading theories of definite descriptions are Frege's, Russell's, Evans's, and Prior's [Bealer]
Maybe proper names have the content of fixing a thing's category [Bealer]