more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 9568

[filed under theme 18. Thought / E. Abstraction / 7. Abstracta by Equivalence ]

Full Idea

What I refer to as an 'equivalence class' (of line segments of a particular length) is an open sentence in my Constructibility Theory. I just use this terminology of the Platonist for didactic purposes.

Gist of Idea

I prefer the open sentences of a Constructibility Theory, to Platonist ideas of 'equivalence classes'

Source

Charles Chihara (A Structural Account of Mathematics [2004], 09.10)

Book Ref

Chihara,Charles: 'A Structural Account of Mathematics' [OUP 2004], p.277


A Reaction

This is because 'equivalence classes' is committed to the existence of classes, which is Quinean Platonism. I am with Chihara in wanting a story that avoids such things. Kit Fine is investigating similar notions of rules of construction.


The 22 ideas from Charles Chihara

We could talk of open sentences, instead of sets [Chihara, by Shapiro]
Chihara's system is a variant of type theory, from which he can translate sentences [Chihara, by Shapiro]
We can replace type theory with open sentences and a constructibility quantifier [Chihara, by Shapiro]
Introduce a constructibility quantifiers (Cx)Φ - 'it is possible to construct an x such that Φ' [Chihara, by Shapiro]
Could we replace sets by the open sentences that define them? [Chihara, by Bostock]
We can replace existence of sets with possibility of constructing token sentences [Chihara, by MacBride]
Mathematical entities are causally inert, so the causal theory of reference won't work for them [Chihara]
The set theorist cannot tell us what 'membership' is [Chihara]
We only know relational facts about the empty set, but nothing intrinsic [Chihara]
What is special about Bill Clinton's unit set, in comparison with all the others? [Chihara]
Sentences are consistent if they can all be true; for Frege it is that no contradiction can be deduced [Chihara]
Analytic geometry gave space a mathematical structure, which could then have axioms [Chihara]
If a successful theory confirms mathematics, presumably a failed theory disconfirms it? [Chihara]
The mathematics of relations is entirely covered by ordered pairs [Chihara]
In simple type theory there is a hierarchy of null sets [Chihara]
A pack of wolves doesn't cease when one member dies [Chihara]
No scientific explanation would collapse if mathematical objects were shown not to exist [Chihara]
I prefer the open sentences of a Constructibility Theory, to Platonist ideas of 'equivalence classes' [Chihara]
ZFU refers to the physical world, when it talks of 'urelements' [Chihara]
The null set is a structural position which has no other position in membership relation [Chihara]
Realists about sets say there exists a null set in the real world, with no members [Chihara]
'Gunk' is an individual possessing no parts that are atoms [Chihara]