more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 9623

[filed under theme 6. Mathematics / C. Sources of Mathematics / 4. Mathematical Empiricism / b. Indispensability of mathematics ]

Full Idea

Field needs the notion of logical consequence in second-order logic, but (since this is not recursively axiomatizable) this is a semantical notion, which involves the idea of 'true in all models', a set-theoretic idea if there ever was one.

Gist of Idea

Field needs a semantical notion of second-order consequence, and that needs sets

Source

comment on Hartry Field (Science without Numbers [1980], Ch.4) by James Robert Brown - Philosophy of Mathematics

Book Ref

Brown,James Robert: 'Philosophy of Mathematics' [Routledge 2002], p.54


A Reaction

Brown here summarises a group of critics. Field was arguing for modern nominalism, that actual numbers could (in principle) be written out of the story, as useful fictions. Popper's attempt to dump induction seemed to need induction.


The 21 ideas from 'Science without Numbers'

In Field's Platonist view, set theory is false because it asserts existence for non-existent things [Field,H, by Chihara]
Logical consequence is defined by the impossibility of P and ¬q [Field,H, by Shapiro]
In Field's version of science, space-time points replace real numbers [Field,H, by Szabó]
The application of mathematics only needs its possibility, not its truth [Field,H, by Shapiro]
Field presumes properties can be eliminated from science [Field,H, by Szabó]
Nominalists try to only refer to physical objects, or language, or mental constructions [Field,H]
Abstract objects are only applicable to the world if they are impure, and connect to the physical [Field,H]
It seems impossible to explain the idea that the conclusion is contained in the premises [Field,H]
Mathematics is only empirical as regards which theory is useful [Field,H]
Abstractions can form useful counterparts to concrete statements [Field,H]
Hilbert explains geometry, by non-numerical facts about space [Field,H]
Relational space is problematic if you take the idea of a field seriously [Field,H]
Both philosophy and physics now make substantivalism more attractive [Field,H]
'Metric' axioms uses functions, points and numbers; 'synthetic' axioms give facts about space [Field,H]
Beneath every extrinsic explanation there is an intrinsic explanation [Field,H]
Field needs a semantical notion of second-order consequence, and that needs sets [Brown,JR on Field,H]
In theories of fields, space-time points or regions are causal agents [Field,H]
'Abstract' is unclear, but numbers, functions and sets are clearly abstract [Field,H]
The Indispensability Argument is the only serious ground for the existence of mathematical entities [Field,H]
You can reduce ontological commitment by expanding the logic [Field,H]
Why regard standard mathematics as truths, rather than as interesting fictions? [Field,H]