more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 9879

[filed under theme 4. Formal Logic / F. Set Theory ST / 4. Axioms for Sets / a. Axioms for sets ]

Full Idea

Quine's New Foundations system of set theory, devised with no model in mind, but on the basis of a hunch that a purely formal restriction on the comprehension axiom would block all contradictions.

Clarification

The 'comprehension axiom' says that every property is collectivizing, or has an extension

Gist of Idea

NF has no models, but just blocks the comprehension axiom, to avoid contradictions

Source

report of Willard Quine (New Foundations for Mathematical Logic [1937]) by Michael Dummett - Frege philosophy of mathematics Ch.18

Book Ref

Dummett,Michael: 'Frege: philosophy of mathematics' [Duckworth 1991], p.230


A Reaction

The point is that Quine (who had an ontological preference for 'desert landscapes') attempted to do without an ontological commitment to objects (and their subsequent models), with a purely formal system. Quine's NF is not now highly regarded.

Related Idea

Idea 13526 Comprehension Axiom: if a collection is clearly specified, it is a set [Wolf,RS]


The 33 ideas with the same theme [general points about the basics of set theory]:

Cantor gives informal versions of ZF axioms as ways of getting from one set to another [Cantor, by Lake]
Axiomatising set theory makes it all relative [Skolem]
Zermelo showed that the ZF axioms in 1930 were non-categorical [Zermelo, by Hallett,M]
Zermelo published his axioms in 1908, to secure a controversial proof [Zermelo, by Maddy]
ZFC: Existence, Extension, Specification, Pairing, Unions, Powers, Infinity, Choice [Zermelo, by Clegg]
Set theory can be reduced to a few definitions and seven independent axioms [Zermelo]
Zermelo made 'set' and 'member' undefined axioms [Zermelo, by Chihara]
For Zermelo's set theory the empty set is zero and the successor of each number is its unit set [Zermelo, by Blackburn]
We perceive the objects of set theory, just as we perceive with our senses [Gödel]
Gödel show that the incompleteness of set theory was a necessity [Gödel, by Hallett,M]
Von Neumann defines each number as the set of all smaller numbers [Neumann, by Blackburn]
ZFC could contain a contradiction, and it can never prove its own consistency [MacLane]
NF has no models, but just blocks the comprehension axiom, to avoid contradictions [Quine, by Dummett]
ZF set theory has variables which range over sets, 'equals' and 'member', and extensionality [Dummett]
The main alternative to ZF is one which includes looser classes as well as sets [Dummett]
A few axioms of set theory 'force themselves on us', but most of them don't [Boolos]
We could add axioms to make sets either as small or as large as possible [Bostock]
Set theory reduces to a mereological theory with singletons as the only atoms [Lewis, by MacBride]
Set theory has some unofficial axioms, generalisations about how to understand it [Lewis]
There cannot be a set theory which is complete [Smith,P]
The standard Z-F Intuition version of set theory has about ten agreed axioms [Benardete,JA, by PG]
Set theory can't be axiomatic, because it is needed to express the very notion of axiomatisation [Mayberry]
There is a semi-categorical axiomatisation of set-theory [Mayberry]
The first-order ZF axiomatisation is highly non-categorical [Hallett,M]
Non-categoricity reveals a sort of incompleteness, with sets existing that the axioms don't reveal [Hallett,M]
New axioms are being sought, to determine the size of the continuum [Maddy]
A Large Cardinal Axiom would assert ever-increasing stages in the hierarchy [Maddy]
Determinacy: an object is either in a set, or it isn't [Zalabardo]
ZFC set theory has only 'pure' sets, without 'urelements' [Reck/Price]
Even the elements of sets in ZFC are sets, resting on the pure empty set [George/Velleman]
Maybe set theory need not be well-founded [Varzi]
Major set theories differ in their axioms, and also over the additional axioms of choice and infinity [Friend]
The iterated conception of set requires continual increase in axiom strength [Rumfitt]