more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 9880

[filed under theme 8. Modes of Existence / E. Nominalism / 1. Nominalism / a. Nominalism ]

Full Idea

The nominalist superstition is based ultimately on the myth of the unmediated presentation of genuine concrete objects to the mind.

Gist of Idea

Nominalism assumes unmediated mental contact with objects

Source

Michael Dummett (Frege philosophy of mathematics [1991], Ch.18)

Book Ref

Dummett,Michael: 'Frege: philosophy of mathematics' [Duckworth 1991], p.231


A Reaction

Personally I am inclined to favour nominalism and a representative theory of perception, which acknowledges some 'mediation', but of a non-linguistic form. Any good theory here had better include animals, which seem to form concepts.


The 17 ideas with the same theme [general ideas about nominalism]:

If only the singular exists, science is impossible, as that relies on true generalities [Duns Scotus, by Panaccio]
If things were singular they would only differ numerically, but horse and tulip differ more than that [Duns Scotus, by Panaccio]
Only individual bodies exist [Bacon]
Obviously 'Socrates is wise' and 'Socrates has wisdom' express the same fact [Ramsey]
I am a deeply convinced nominalist [Tarski]
Refusal to explain why different tokens are of the same type is to be an ostrich [Armstrong]
Nominalism only makes sense if it is materialist [Putnam]
'Nominalism' used to mean denial of universals, but now means denial of abstract objects [Dummett]
Nominalism assumes unmediated mental contact with objects [Dummett]
For nominalists, predicate extensions are inexplicable facts [Molnar]
Nominalists only accept first-order logic [Molnar]
Nominalism can reject abstractions, or universals, or sets [Oliver]
Nominalists are motivated by Ockham's Razor and a distrust of unobservables [Hoffman/Rosenkrantz]
Austere nominalism has to take a host of things (like being red, or human) as primitive [Loux]
Nominalists suspect that properties etc are our projections, and could have been different [Williamson]
A 'porridge' nominalist thinks we just divide reality in any way that suits us [Mumford]
Moderate nominalism attempts to embrace the existence of properties while avoiding universals [Moreland]