more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 9884

[filed under theme 7. Existence / C. Structure of Existence / 7. Abstract/Concrete / a. Abstract/concrete ]

Full Idea

The distinction between concrete and abstract objects, or Frege's corresponding distinction between actual and non-actual objects, is not a sharp dichotomy, but resembles a scale upon which objects occupy a range of positions.

Gist of Idea

The distinction of concrete/abstract, or actual/non-actual, is a scale, not a dichotomy

Source

Michael Dummett (Frege philosophy of mathematics [1991], Ch.18)

Book Ref

Dummett,Michael: 'Frege: philosophy of mathematics' [Duckworth 1991], p.239


A Reaction

This might seem right if you live (as Dummett chooses to) in the fog of language, but it surely can't be right if you think about reality. Is the Equator supposed to be near the middle of his scale? Either there is an equator, or there isn't.

Related Idea

Idea 9918 Abstract/concrete is a distinction of kind, not degree [Burgess/Rosen]


The 27 ideas from 'Frege philosophy of mathematics'

Content is replaceable if identical, so replaceability can't define identity [Dummett, by Dummett]
There is no reason why abstraction by equivalence classes should be called 'logical' [Dummett, by Tait]
Why should the limit of measurement be points, not intervals? [Dummett]
Addition of quantities is prior to ordering, as shown in cyclic domains like angles [Dummett]
A prime number is one which is measured by a unit alone [Dummett]
A number is a multitude composed of units [Dummett]
In classical logic, logical truths are valid formulas; in higher-order logics they are purely logical [Dummett]
The identity of a number may be fixed by something outside structure - by counting [Dummett]
Numbers aren't fixed by position in a structure; it won't tell you whether to start with 0 or 1 [Dummett]
To abstract from spoons (to get the same number as the forks), the spoons must be indistinguishable too [Dummett]
Fregean semantics assumes a domain articulated into individual objects [Dummett]
Frege introduced criteria for identity, but thought defining identity was circular [Dummett]
A contextual definition permits the elimination of the expression by a substitution [Dummett]
We understand 'there are as many nuts as apples' as easily by pairing them as by counting them [Dummett]
Maybe a concept is 'prior' to another if it can be defined without the second concept [Dummett]
An argument for conceptual priority is greater simplicity in explanation [Dummett]
We arrive at the concept 'suicide' by comparing 'Cato killed Cato' with 'Brutus killed Brutus' [Dummett]
Realism is just the application of two-valued semantics to sentences [Dummett]
Abstract objects nowadays are those which are objective but not actual [Dummett]
It is absurd to deny the Equator, on the grounds that it lacks causal powers [Dummett]
'We've crossed the Equator' has truth-conditions, so accept the Equator - and it's an object [Dummett]
Abstract objects need the context principle, since they can't be encountered directly [Dummett]
Abstract terms are acceptable as long as we know how they function linguistically [Dummett]
Set theory isn't part of logic, and why reduce to something more complex? [Dummett]
The distinction of concrete/abstract, or actual/non-actual, is a scale, not a dichotomy [Dummett]
Nominalism assumes unmediated mental contact with objects [Dummett]
The existence of abstract objects is a pseudo-problem [Dummett]