more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 9925

[filed under theme 6. Mathematics / B. Foundations for Mathematics / 7. Mathematical Structuralism / c. Nominalist structuralism ]

Full Idea

Usually structuralism and nominalism are considered rivals. But structuralism can also be the first step in a strategy of nominalist reconstrual or paraphrase.

Gist of Idea

Structuralism and nominalism are normally rivals, but might work together

Source

JP Burgess / G Rosen (A Subject with No Object [1997], II.C.0)

Book Ref

Burgess,J/Rosen,G: 'A Subject with No Object' [OUP 1997], p.147


A Reaction

Hellman and later Chihara seem to be the main proponents of nominalist structuralism. My sympathies lie with this strategy. Are there objects at the nodes of the structure, or is the structure itself platonic? Mill offers a route.


The 15 ideas from 'A Subject with No Object'

Abstract/concrete is a distinction of kind, not degree [Burgess/Rosen]
The old debate classified representations as abstract, not entities [Burgess/Rosen]
'True' is only occasionally useful, as in 'everything Fermat believed was true' [Burgess/Rosen]
If space is really just a force-field, then it is a physical entity [Burgess/Rosen]
We should talk about possible existence, rather than actual existence, of numbers [Burgess/Rosen]
Modal logic gives an account of metalogical possibility, not metaphysical possibility [Burgess/Rosen]
Structuralism and nominalism are normally rivals, but might work together [Burgess/Rosen]
A relation is either a set of sets of sets, or a set of sets [Burgess/Rosen]
Mereology implies that acceptance of entities entails acceptance of conglomerates [Burgess/Rosen]
Mathematics has ascended to higher and higher levels of abstraction [Burgess/Rosen]
Much of what science says about concrete entities is 'abstraction-laden' [Burgess/Rosen]
Abstraction is on a scale, of sets, to attributes, to type-formulas, to token-formulas [Burgess/Rosen]
The paradoxes are only a problem for Frege; Cantor didn't assume every condition determines a set [Burgess/Rosen]
The paradoxes no longer seem crucial in critiques of set theory [Burgess/Rosen]
Number words became nouns around the time of Plato [Burgess/Rosen]