more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 9941

[filed under theme 6. Mathematics / C. Sources of Mathematics / 4. Mathematical Empiricism / b. Indispensability of mathematics ]

Full Idea

Science demands much more of a mathematical theory than that it should merely be consistent, as the example of the various alternative systems of geometry dramatizes.

Gist of Idea

Science requires more than consistency of mathematics

Source

Hilary Putnam (Mathematics without Foundations [1967])

Book Ref

'Philosophy of Mathematics: readings (2nd)', ed/tr. Benacerraf/Putnam [CUP 1983], p.302


A Reaction

Well said. I don't agree with Putnam's Indispensability claims, but if an apparent system of numbers or lines has no application to the world then I don't consider it to be mathematics. It is a new game, like chess.


The 6 ideas from 'Mathematics without Foundations'

I do not believe mathematics either has or needs 'foundations' [Putnam]
Science requires more than consistency of mathematics [Putnam]
You can't deny a hypothesis a truth-value simply because we may never know it! [Putnam]
It is conceivable that the axioms of arithmetic or propositional logic might be changed [Putnam]
Maybe mathematics is empirical in that we could try to change it [Putnam]
We understand some statements about all sets [Putnam]