more on this theme     |     more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 11884

[filed under theme 10. Modality / E. Possible worlds / 3. Transworld Objects / d. Haecceitism ]

Full Idea

The theory that things have 'haecceities' must be sharply distinguished from the theory referred to as 'haecceitism', which says there may be differences in transworld identities that do not supervene on qualitative differences.

Clarification

One might translate 'haecceity' [pr 'hex-ey-ety'] as 'thisness'

Gist of Idea

The theory of 'haecceitism' does not need commitment to individual haecceities

Source

Penelope Mackie (How Things Might Have Been [2006], 2.2 n7)

Book Ref

Mackie,Penelope: 'How Things Might Have Been' [OUP 2006], p.21


A Reaction

She says later [p,43 n] that it is possible to be a haecceitist without believing in individual haecceities, if (say) the transworld identities had no basis at all. Note that if 'thisness' is 'haecceity', then 'whatness' is 'quiddity'.