more on this theme     |     more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 17440

[filed under theme 6. Mathematics / B. Foundations for Mathematics / 5. Definitions of Number / d. Hume's Principle ]

Full Idea

Wright intends the claim that Hume's Principle (HP) embodies an explanation of the concept of number to imply that it is analytic of the concept of cardinal number - so it is an analytic or conceptual truth, much as a definition would be.

Clarification

HP says 1-1 correspondence means same number

Gist of Idea

Wright says Hume's Principle is analytic of cardinal numbers, like a definition

Source

report of Crispin Wright (Frege's Concept of Numbers as Objects [1983]) by Richard G. Heck - Cardinality, Counting and Equinumerosity 1

Book Ref

-: 'Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic' [-], p.189


A Reaction

Boolos is quoted as disagreeing. Wright is claiming a fundamental truth. Boolos says something can fix the character of something (as yellow fixes bananas), but that doesn't make it 'fundamental'. I want to defend 'fundamental'.