more on this theme     |     more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 19323

[filed under theme 3. Truth / F. Semantic Truth / 1. Tarski's Truth / c. Meta-language for truth ]

Full Idea

The difference between (a) snow is white, and (b) 'snow is white' true is that the first makes a claim that only depends on the colour of snow, while the second depends both on the colour of snow and the meaning of the sentence 'snow is white'.

Gist of Idea

'Snow is white' depends on meaning; whether snow is white depends on snow

Source

John Etchemendy (Tarski on Truth and Logical Consequence [1988], p.61), quoted by Richard L. Kirkham - Theories of Truth: a Critical Introduction 5.7

Book Ref

Kirkham,Richard L.: 'Theories of Truth: a Critical Introduction' [MIT 1995], p.167


A Reaction

This is a helpful first step for those who have reached screaming point by being continually offered this apparently vacuous equivalence. This sentence works well if that stuff is a particular colour.