more on this theme     |     more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 10543

[filed under theme 9. Objects / A. Existence of Objects / 2. Abstract Objects / c. Modern abstracta ]

Full Idea

For an object to be abstract, we require only that an understanding of any name of that object involves a recognition that the object is in the range of some functional expression.

Gist of Idea

Abstract objects must have names that fall within the range of some functional expression

Source

Michael Dummett (Frege Philosophy of Language (2nd ed) [1973], Ch.14)

Book Ref

Dummett,Michael: 'Frege Philosophy of Language' [Duckworth 1981], p.485


A Reaction

I'm not sure I understand this, but a function must involve a relation between some objects, such that a unique object is consequently picked out.