more on this theme     |     more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 6016

[filed under theme 22. Metaethics / A. Ethics Foundations / 2. Source of Ethics / j. Ethics by convention ]

Full Idea

Protagoras and Hippias evidently believed that convention was an improvement on nature, whereas later sophists such as Antiphon, Thrasymachus and Callicles seemed to contend that conventional morality was undermined because it was 'against nature'.

Gist of Idea

Early sophists thought convention improved nature; later they said nature was diminished by it

Source

report of Protagoras (fragments/reports [c.441 BCE]) by Fred D. Miller jr - Classical Political Thought

Book Ref

'Encyclopedia of Classical Philosophy', ed/tr. Zeyl,Donald J. [Fitzroy Dearborn 1997], p.441


A Reaction

This gets to the heart of a much more interesting aspect of the nomos-physis (convention-nature) debate, rather than just a slanging match between relativists and the rest. The debate still goes on, over issues about the free market and intervention.