more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 16538

[filed under theme 10. Modality / E. Possible worlds / 1. Possible Worlds / e. Against possible worlds ]

Full Idea

If we explicate the notion of metaphysical necessity in terms of the notion of essence, rather than vice versa, this may enable us to dispense with the language of possible worlds as a means of explicating modal statements.

Gist of Idea

We could give up possible worlds if we based necessity on essences

Source

E.J. Lowe (What is the Source of Knowledge of Modal Truths? [2013], 6)

Book Ref

-: 'Mind' [-], p.16


A Reaction

This is the approach I favour, though I am not convinced that the two approaches are in competition, since essentialism gives the driving force for necessity, whereas possible worlds map the logic and semantics of it.


The 19 ideas from 'What is the Source of Knowledge of Modal Truths?'

Logical necessities, based on laws of logic, are a proper sub-class of metaphysical necessities [Lowe]
'Metaphysical' necessity is absolute and objective - the strongest kind of necessity [Lowe]
'Epistemic' necessity is better called 'certainty' [Lowe]
'Intuitions' are just unreliable 'hunches'; over centuries intuitions change enormously [Lowe]
A concept is a way of thinking of things or kinds, whether or not they exist [Lowe]
Explanation can't give an account of essence, because it is too multi-faceted [Lowe]
H2O isn't necessary, because different laws of nature might affect how O and H combine [Lowe]
If an essence implies p, then p is an essential truth, and hence metaphysically necessary [Lowe]
Metaphysical necessity is either an essential truth, or rests on essential truths [Lowe]
We could give up possible worlds if we based necessity on essences [Lowe]
A definition of a circle will show what it is, and show its generating principle [Lowe]
Defining an ellipse by conic sections reveals necessities, but not the essence of an ellipse [Lowe]
An essence is what an entity is, revealed by a real definition; this is not an entity in its own right [Lowe]
Simple things like 'red' can be given real ostensive definitions [Lowe]
The essence of lumps and statues shows that two objects coincide but are numerically distinct [Lowe]
The essence of a bronze statue shows that it could be made of different bronze [Lowe]
Grasping an essence is just grasping a real definition [Lowe]
If we must know some entity to know an essence, we lack a faculty to do that [Lowe]
Direct reference doesn't seem to require that thinkers know what it is they are thinking about [Lowe]