more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 9825

[filed under theme 9. Objects / A. Existence of Objects / 3. Objects in Thought ]

Full Idea

A thing (an object of our thought) is completely determined by all that can be affirmed or thought concerning it.

Gist of Idea

A thing is completely determined by all that can be thought concerning it

Source

Richard Dedekind (Nature and Meaning of Numbers [1888], I.1)

Book Ref

Dedekind,Richard: 'Essays on the Theory of Numbers' [Dover 1963], p.44


A Reaction

How could you justify this as an observation? Why can't there be unthinkable things (even by God)? Presumably Dedekind is offering a stipulative definition, but we may then be confusing epistemology with ontology.


The 28 ideas from Richard Dedekind

We want the essence of continuity, by showing its origin in arithmetic [Dedekind]
Arithmetic is just the consequence of counting, which is the successor operation [Dedekind]
A cut between rational numbers creates and defines an irrational number [Dedekind]
If x changes by less and less, it must approach a limit [Dedekind]
I say the irrational is not the cut itself, but a new creation which corresponds to the cut [Dedekind]
Dedekindian abstraction talks of 'positions', where Cantorian abstraction talks of similar objects [Dedekind, by Fine,K]
Dedekind has a conception of abstraction which is not psychologistic [Dedekind, by Tait]
Dedekind said numbers were abstracted from systems of objects, leaving only their position [Dedekind, by Dummett]
Categoricity implies that Dedekind has characterised the numbers, because it has one domain [Rumfitt on Dedekind]
Dedekind gives a base number which isn't a successor, then adds successors and induction [Dedekind, by Hart,WD]
Zero is a member, and all successors; numbers are the intersection of sets satisfying this [Dedekind, by Bostock]
Induction is proved in Dedekind, an axiom in Peano; the latter seems simpler and clearer [Dedekind, by Russell]
Dedekind's axiom that his Cut must be filled has the advantages of theft over honest toil [Dedekind, by Russell]
Dedekind says each cut matches a real; logicists say the cuts are the reals [Dedekind, by Bostock]
Dedekind proved definition by recursion, and thus proved the basic laws of arithmetic [Dedekind, by Potter]
Dedekind's ordinals are just members of any progression whatever [Dedekind, by Russell]
Dedekind defined the integers, rationals and reals in terms of just the natural numbers [Dedekind, by George/Velleman]
Order, not quantity, is central to defining numbers [Dedekind, by Monk]
Ordinals can define cardinals, as the smallest ordinal that maps the set [Dedekind, by Heck]
Numbers are free creations of the human mind, to understand differences [Dedekind]
In counting we see the human ability to relate, correspond and represent [Dedekind]
Dedekind originated the structuralist conception of mathematics [Dedekind, by MacBride]
An infinite set maps into its own proper subset [Dedekind, by Reck/Price]
Dedekind originally thought more in terms of mereology than of sets [Dedekind, by Potter]
A thing is completely determined by all that can be thought concerning it [Dedekind]
We have the idea of self, and an idea of that idea, and so on, so infinite ideas are available [Dedekind, by Potter]
A system S is said to be infinite when it is similar to a proper part of itself [Dedekind]
We derive the natural numbers, by neglecting everything of a system except distinctness and order [Dedekind]