more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 20346

[filed under theme 21. Aesthetics / A. Aesthetic Experience / 2. Aesthetic Attitude ]

Full Idea

The aesthetic attitude is defined by Kant in terms of disinterestedness.

Gist of Idea

The aesthetic attitude is a matter of disinterestedness

Source

report of Immanuel Kant (Critique of Judgement I: Aesthetic [1790]) by Richard Wollheim - Art and Its Objects 54

Book Ref

Wollheim,Richard: 'Art and Its Objects' [Penguin 1975], p.146


A Reaction

This is presumably, mainly, to explain our enjoyment of the miseries of tragedy. We just give ourselves up to a merry jig by Haydn.


The 13 ideas from 'Critique of Judgement I: Aesthetic'

Kant gave form and status to aesthetics, and Hegel gave it content [Kant, by Scruton]
The aesthetic attitude is a matter of disinterestedness [Kant, by Wollheim]
Only rational beings can experience beauty [Kant, by Scruton]
The beautiful is not conceptualised as moral, but it symbolises or resembles goodness [Kant, by Murdoch]
Kant saw beauty as a sort of disinterested pleasure, which has become separate from the good [Kant, by Taylor,C]
The mathematical sublime is immeasurable greatness; the dynamical sublime is overpowering [Kant, by Pinkard]
Aesthetic values are not objectively valid, but we must treat them as if they are [Kant, by Scruton]
The sublime is a moral experience [Kant, by Gardner]
The judgement of beauty is not cognitive, but relates, via imagination, to pleasurable feelings [Kant]
Beauty is only judged in pure contemplation, and not with something else at stake [Kant]
With respect to the senses, taste is an entirely personal matter [Kant]
When we judge beauty, it isn't just personal; we judge on behalf of everybody [Kant]
Saying everyone has their own taste destroys the very idea of taste [Kant]